Friday, 11 November 2022

Le Rayon-Vert

History, as historian, Howard Zinn, noted, is an infinite series of events. In order to tell any story, real or imagined, one must cherry pick from those individual moments to form a coherent narrative. How one decides which events to depict and which to omit is ultimately a choice based on demographics and the background noise of commonly held mythologies in which our tribe is placed at the very centre of things. There are no objective voices. All of human existence and experience is subjective. Or as Zinn reflected in the title of his memoir: You Can’t Be Neutral on a Moving Train.

Yet as Douglas Adams remind us in one of his typical aphorisms masquerading as comic wit: if life is going to exist in a Universe of this size, then the one thing it cannot afford to have is a sense of proportion.  Or perspective. In a chaotic, non-deterministic world, it takes a sentient mind to find patterns amongst the randomness. We create meaning in the meaningless. We find shapes in signal noise like faces seen in clouds.

Such cherry picking can bring purpose or it can send us chasing shadows of conspiracy. All of us at some time lose our sense of proportion and our sense of perspective. It can be humiliating and disheartening when a long held belief is shown to be erroneous: When the fleeting cloud face deforms into a new shape, or the grotesque in the shadows resolves into something benign and mundane: To realise that the Universe never thinks about us and will neither mourn or even notice our passing. Our relevance is limited to the time in which we exist. It is fleeting and when it is over it quickly fades, like an afterimage of the sun.

Yet what can we do? We must find meaning in order to thrive; in order to survive. The following history (apt, given the double meaning of histoire in French) is of no significance or importance to anyone but me. Which is exactly the thing that gives it meaning.

I grew up on naval estates. Eight of the first twelve years of my life were spent living in and around Helensburgh in the west of Scotland, down the coast from the Faslaine Naval Base where my father was stationed. We lived there on three separate occasions, as well as stints in Plymouth, Birmingham and Barrow in Furness, where my brother was born. 

Helensburgh

I began my life in this area, born in the Vale of Leven hospital in Alexandria by the banks of Loch Lomond. Year later in Balloch, next to Alexandria, we would take our dog, Boomer, for long walks in the park where he could tire himself out. And, inevitably, throw himself into the waters of the loch at every opportunity.

This is where many of my formative experiences took place. I first read the Hobbit here. I first heard Queen here. Owned my first computer here (a Spectrum 48k+). Here I watched Live Aid. I watched Raiders of the Lost Ark at one friend’s house and saw pirated copies of Ghostbusters and Gremlins at another’s. I learned about new films from watching Film ’84, Film ’85 and all of its subsequent incarnations.

At the beginning of 1986, my father left the Navy after more than twenty years and we found ourselves in Eastbourne, on the south west coast of England. More formative experiences. Sea Cadets. Sailing. Visiting Herstmonceux Observatory with Astronomy Club. Seeing the Hobbit play at the local theatre. Discovering the Hitch Hiker’s Guide to the Galaxy for the first time. Also discovering Jules Verne.

It happened because of watching Film ’86 or Film ’87. Barry Norman’s review for a film called, Le Rayon Vert. The film came out in 1986, but it might not have been released in the UK until the following year. The film itself was of little interest to me. What did interest me was the background details. The film was named after the Jules Verne novel of the same name.

The title was what fascinated me. Le Rayon Vert. Translated as, The Green Ray, it refers to the very final particles of light that radiate out from the sun at sunset. The phenomenon is rare and can only be seen under certain conditions and in certain parts of the world. On very calm stretches of ocean or incredibly flat stretches of desert. From high and dry mountain planes or in fight with no cloud cover obscuring the view.

There is an old legend that anyone who sees the green ray will start to make sense of their life. The idea beguiled me. I went to the library to try and find a copy of the book, but it is not regarded as a major work from the dozens Jules Verne wrote and our small, local library was unlikely to carry a copy. What I did find was a copy of Five Weeks in a Ballon, which I withdrew and took home.

Jules Verne has been with me from that time until now. I don’t remember if I even finished Five Weeks in a Balloon that first time. The text was small and in a book that fitted easily in my squat palm. I remember struggling through it and the memory is clouded as to whether I finished it or not. I think it’s likely that I kept renewing the loan period in the hope of completing it, but gave up at some point and returned it to the library in favour of something less challenging.

What I did have was a collection of abridged versions of the classics, cut down for adolescent readers. The Old Curiosity Shop. Tom Brown’s School Days. Ivanhoe. There were many others, as well as what are perhaps Jules Verne’s three most famous novels: 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, Journey to the Centre of the Earth and Around the World in Eighty Days.

These books I did complete. There was a sponsored reading week or fortnight in which they formed the core of the books I read in that time. It was a struggle. I was not a natural reader at that time. Amazing when you consider that as an adult I read between one and two hundred books a year across a breadth of genres. But if any writer laid the foundations on that long journey from faltering to accomplished reader, it was Jules Verne.

Verne was for a long time considered a children’s writer in the English speaking world. This is mainly the fault of terrible translations from the French in which he wrote. Yet if one considers for instance, 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, there is much scientific detail included. It doesn’t quite go to the extent of Moby Dick, where Melville was essentially copying out, verbatim, oceanic and biological passages from textbooks, but it’s not far off. The abridged, children’s edition that I read in Eastbourne obviously excised much of these technical passages. Which is probably for the best. They’re hard enough to understand as an adult.

I guess the light soon faded on my interest in Jules Verne, as do all such fleeting childhood obsessions. It was only as an adult, inspired by Michael Palin’s Around the World in Eighty Days, that I returned to Jules Verne. Yet by this point in my life, I had become a literary magpie, fascinated by every new shiny object. Graham Greene novels. George Orwell’s fiction and non-fiction. Maya Anjou autobiography. Frankenstein. His Dark Materials. Jane Eyre. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy books read again and again and again.

As such, my re-acquaintance and deep dive into Jules Verne’s novels has been slow. I reread 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, Journey to the Centre of the Earth and Around the World in Eighty Days in their unabridged versions. I read From Earth to Moon and Around the Moon in a single edition. I struggled through the overlong The Mysterious Island. But there wasn’t much else to choose from. Despite writing many novels during his lifetime, very few are commonly available in English translation. Even once popular books like Une Ville Flottante, or A Floating City, are these days hard to find. So I did the only thing I could do. I turned to versions in their original French.

Actually, it was the other way around. My French has always been middling, despite studying it on and off since Eastbourne. But I had started trying to read more in French, having hoarded second hand Folio editions since university. Satre. Camus. Zola. All far above my level, but you can’t expect to go any higher unless you’re prepared to climb. So I read them. And reread them. And looked up the words I didn’t know. Which in the modern world, with access to resources like Wiktionary, is easier than ever.

In the meantime, I acquired other French language editions. Flaubert. Simone de Beauvoir. More Zola (I love Zola). A translation of Ulysses (difficulty level: God) brought back for me from France. I found online resources. I recommend ebooksgrauit.com, which has open source copies of many copyright expired books, including Verne, Zola, George Sand, Alexander Dumas and many others in a number of different formats.

Somewhere online I found a download of more than fifty Jules Verne novels and short stories and dove in. At the beginning I decided to go though hem in order of publication. Which meant the first book on the list was, ironically, Cinq Semaines en Ballon, or Five Weeks in a Balloon. Nearly twenty five years later, I finally finished reading it.

Along with the next book in the series, Voyages et Adventures du Capitaine Hatteras, you find a key feature of Verne’s writing in Cinq Semaines en Ballon. As much as his novels are about the adventure or voyage being depicted, they are also about the history of adventure and exploration. Cinq Semaines en Ballon is about travelling across Africa in a balloon, but it is about the history of European exploration in Africa (with the destructive consequences of colonial exploration glossed over with depressing predictability).  Voyages et Adventures du Capitaine Hatteras is about the journey to reach the North Pole, but is also about Arctic and Antarctic exploration in general.

I soon abandoned the chronological reading order. Many of Verne’s earlier novels were serialised in magazine form and are long books as a result. My French remains middling and I need shorter books to retain the concentration levels. So I read some of his shorter novels in between Madame Bovary and Le Deuxième Sexe and a couple of books by Senegalese writer, Fatou Diome. At some point I remembered Le Rayon Vert and routed through the download folder but couldn’t find it. It is such a minor story that it wasn’t even included with fifty nine others freely available for download.

Yet Le Rayon Vert is out there. I found a .pdf copy of the book and downloaded it. I knew I would get around to it, but opened the file to check it wasn’t corrupted. And what did I find on the very first page, but reference to Helensburgh! The damned book that stared my interest in Jules Verne, that paved the way to my love of reading, takes place in the place where I began.

Why I didn’t abandon everything I was doing and read the book there and then, I don’t know. I was reading too much as it was. I was probably already reading something else by Jules Verne. So I closed the file down and forgot about it for a year or two.

When I did read it, a week ago as I write, the book featured so much more than Helensburgh. The bulk of the story takes places in and around Oban and the Hebrides. Yet it opens and ends on the outskirts of Helensburgh, close to Faslaine. But more than that, Verne makes reference to Leven, when I was born, and Balloch, where we took Boomer to run himself ragged. Clearly Verne visited the area. People living in Glasgow, twenty miles away, are barely aware of these places. To think that Jules Verne came to these places and was inspired to write a novel, even a minor one, is of great significance to me, even, and because, it means so little to anyone else.

The book itself is fine. It contains scattered references to the works of Sir Walter Scott and it seems to be a pastiche of Scott and other early 19th century romantic novelists. Scott was at one time the most famous novelist in the world, although his influence had declined by the end of the century. He had a huge influence on the likes of Alexander Dumas, who was a contemporary and good friend of Jules Verne.

Le Rayon-Vert is the age old tale of a woman, Helena Campbell, being compelled to marry one man, but the man is a prize tool. She won’t agree to marry him until she has seen the green ray, which is a bit like wanting to find the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. She sets off in the direction of Oban, where conditions might be right to witness the phenomenon. On the journey from Helensburgh, she meets the man who she will actually marry. When the green ray finally appears at the end of the novel, the couple are instead looking at each other, the faint reflection seen in each other’s eyes. They are each other’s green ray, where meaning has been found all by itself.

Le Rayon-Vert is a very different novel from most of the others that Verne wrote (certainly of the ones I have read). Perhaps that’s why it’s not included with his common cannon. There is no race across the world, or balloon ride over Africa, or journey into the bowels of the Earth. There are no futuristic submarines or space rockets shot out of a giant cannon. The journey Helena Campbell makes from Helensburgh to Oban is one that can be made by anyone today. Although Le Rayon-Vert is included in Verne’s Voyages Extraordinaires series, it is as much a romance as it is an adventure novel. The voyage is commonplace rather than being in any way extraordinary.

Moreover, Le Rayon-Vert is rarely mentioned in reference to Helensburgh. The town’s website makes no mention of Jules Verne. Neither does its Wikipedia page. None of the people I know who have lived in Helensburgh or been there had even heard of Le Rayon-Vert until I mentioned it.

Where Le Rayon-Vert is mentioned is in the film of the same name. I did watch it ten years ago when renting it from Love Film during the brief period when receiving DVD rentals through the post was a thing. I watched it again after finishing the novel. 

It’s an odd film. Largely made up of scenes of improvised dialogue. It was apparently shot using a crew of four. In several scenes, the actors are caught glancing at the camera, which is impossible to conceal or style out. I haven’t seen any other films by director, Eric Rohmer’s, but it appears to be typical of his style. Glacial storytelling. Little in the way of scored music but lots of ambient noise. From what little I have read, Rohmer is a love-him-or-hate-him director. Le Rayon-Vert is one of a series of films that he made in the 1980s that are similar, thematically. I’d like to watch the others in the series.

Film and book have little in common narratively speaking, but share some of the same themes. Both feature women as their main characters with Delphine the analogue to Helena Campbell. Yet while Helena is a force of nature, Delphine is introverted and defensive against the efforts by her friends to talk with her. She spends the whole film on her own, even as scuzzy men follow her down the street. At Biarritz train station she meets Jacques,  who’s only marginally less sleazy, but the two end the film sat on a hilltop at sunset, waiting for the green ray. Unlike Helena, she sees the ray for herself (a terrible post-production effect), which suggest Jacques will be a fleeting acquaintance.

I’d forgotten the scene where Delphine happens upon a book club sat on a wall, discussing Verne’s Le Rayon-Vert and the phenomenon in general. She sits on a bench beneath them to listen. It might have even been one of the clips Barry Norman showed on Film ’86 or Film ’87. It’s a patchy film, but somewhat beguiling. Ten years after seeing it for the first time, there was much I remembered and even anticipated. It’s one of those films where you look up the actors on IMDB to see where you know them from and it turns out where you know them from is this film.

I prefer the book to the film, but it’s not a fair contest. The film doesn’t feature even one scene set in Helensburgh. Yet without the film, I would never have arrived at the novel. I would certainly have turned to Jules Verne eventually. I am too much of a sci-fi nerd not to have done so. But Le Rayon-Vert would have been a long way down the line. I might have stumbled upon it eventually, having finished all the other Jules Verne novels. Which would have meant missing a novel that is minor to the world, but more significant than the sum of its parts. The film is an essential link in a chain that leads back to the book and into personal history.

We find meaning in meaninglessness. Find patterns among the randomness. There is nothing mystical about Verne’s Le Rayon-Vert beginning and ending in Helensburgh, nor a chance reference in a Barry Norman program setting me on my literary way. I have seen the green ray in two different incarnations, but nothing has been brought into focus or the meaning of the universe revealed.

As with in English, I have become a magpie of French language novels. I will continue to plough through forty or fifty more Jules Verne stories, in between books by Zola, Sand, Rousseau, Camus, Irène Némirovsky, Stendhal, Dumas and a dozen other authors besides. Perhaps the path was always laid out before me. If it hadn’t been La rue Jules Verne, another route would have led me in the same direction. Yet in a world of such size, we cannot afford to think about roads not taken. This is where we find ourselves. This is where I am. Le Rayon-Vert has been my guiding star.


 

Drive Wheel

This is heaven, she thinks. Flashing lights. Bass pounding in her chest. Several hundred writhing bodies all moving to the beat. Sweat pouring off of her body. Hips moving. Arms flailing. Booty shaking. Everyone cheering in pauses of the relentless rhythm. Who needs the gym when this the only cardio vascular activity you will ever need? This is vital. This is living. This is all there is.

Time loses meaning here. Who cares how she got here? This is where she is. And if you are happy with where you are at any moment, you can’t regret any decision that put you there. It’s the wrong turns that take you to unexpected places. She had always lived for the moment. The moment that seems to last an eternity. Like Sartre’s idea of the perfect moment. Like now.

Worshipping at the church of sound. That’s what someone called it once. And she had bourne witness to the beat all over the world, on every continent, even a party boat off the coast of Antarctica. Now the bright lights have led her here. To the apotheosis of rave culture. Ibiza has nothing on this place. She loves it here. She could stay here forever.

I hate it here. Why am I here? I hate clubs. Clubs are the crystalisation of everything I despise. Enclosed spaces. Bright lights. Noise. Sweaty herberts. Other people’s music. Other people. Not to mention dancing. The sight of people dancing makes my genitalia retreat inside my body. Someone asked me why I wasn’t dancing. Self-awareness, I replied. Dignity. Basic self-control. Take your pick. No-one looks good dancing.

Why am I here? It can’t have been my choice. Too much to drink perhaps. I don’t remember drinking anything, but the aftertaste of lukewarm lager from the half empty plastic pint glass on the sticky table in front of me seems to contradict that memory. Did someone drop something in my drink and drag me here? Don’t remember being in the pub. Last thing I remember, I was driving. Undipped headlights on the road ahead of me. Then nothing. Then here.

So many regrets. So many wrong choices. So many wrong turns. So busy closing myself off to new opportunities; new experiences. And for what? To end up here, sat alone in the worst place I can imagine, while people enjoy their lives all around me. This is sadistic. This is torture. This is hell.

 This is heaven, this is hell.
This is living, this is tale to tell.
This is drive wheel, this is cog.
This is master, this is snarling dog.
 

Chumbawamba, Bad Dog, Good Girl

 


Books on Film: Drive My Car

 *spoilers*

Ryûsuke Hamaguchi’s 2021 film, Drive My Car, is based on the Haruki Murakami short story of the same name. Actually, the film takes sections from three Murakami stories included in the 2014 collection, Men Without Women (Onna no inai otokotachi). Elements from Scheherazade and Kino complete the triptych.

The original story is no longer than forty pages and yet the film adaptation runs to nearly three hours. So how much of the film is derived from its source material? The short answer is, not much. Yet, as we shall see, what Drive My Car lacks in fidelity of translation, it makes up for by creating a cinematic landscape faithful and familiar to much of Murakami’s writing.

Murakami’s version of Drive my Car can be summarised as follows: Stage actor, Kafuku, is forced to hire a driver to take to and from rehearsals of The Cherry Orchard after being convicted of drunk driving. His driver is 24 year old Misaki Watar. During the journey, Kafuku practices his lines by way of a tape recording and tells Misaki about his wife, who died of cancer many years before.

Kafuku’s wife had had a string of affairs during their marriage. After her death, he befriends her final lover in hope of finding a weakness by which he can emotionally torture the man. Yet he comes to like him and after six months of drinking together in bars, Kafuku breaks off the friendship. Watar tells him that his wife’s affairs probably had nothing to do with her love for him one way or another. The story ends with Kafuku falling asleep on the back seat of the car.

 

The most glaring difference between story and film is that the story takes place almost exclusively in the car. Other than breaking off halfway through to tell in flashback the barroom meetings between Kafuku and Takatsuki, the action is confined to the inside of Kafuku’s Saab. Despite retaining the title of the story, the scenes inside the car are only one small part of the film.

Indeed, it is more than forty five minutes before Misaki makes an appearance. The first act focuses on Kafuku relationship with his wife, Oto, leading up to her demise. The cause of her death is changed. Three quarters of an hour elapse before the opening credits roll (delayed credits are apparently a trend in cinema at the moment). A different rationale is presented for Kafuku being driven to rehearsals, having to do with insurance premiums on the production, of which he is the director. The rehearsal tape playing in the car had been recorded by his late wife.

The film extends on the short story by drawing the rehearsal sessions into the action. It is a multi-lingual production, employing actors from China, Korea and Japan, including a Korean actor who speaks only in sign language. Moreover, Oto’s lover is brought into the present day, being cast in the part of Boris. As much as in the story, his inclusion in the production is an act of masochism on the part of Kafuku.

Takatsuki is younger than the Murakami version. More brash and arrogant. He is the one who instigates the drinking sessions with Kafuku, making the scenes more combative than in print. Kafuku is reticent to engage Takatsuki and give him the acting advice he craves. He is more generous with his direction towards others in the production.

Kafuku had walked in on Takatsuki and his wife in bed together, which is the main element taken from the story, Kino. Although unlike Kino, Kafuku leaves without being seen by the lovers and never reveals to his wife what he saw. Later we hear Oto had many affairs, but unlike the story it is unclear whether this is true or whether he tells Takatsuki this to wound the man and reduce the importance of their relationship in his mind.

Takatsuki has his revenge of sorts on Kafuku. Like the woman known only as Scheherazade in the story of the same name, Oto tells her lovers stories during and after sex. One of the final stories she tells to Kafuku is unfinished and almost identical to the main one Scheherazade tells. How Scheherazade broke into the house of a boy she was at school with. How she stole small items from his bedroom and left things like tampons hidden in his drawers.

Oto tells Kafuku she could never finish the story and yet Takatsuki knows how it ends, further highlighting the intensity of her relationship with the latter over the former. Yet the story does not end in the way it does in the book. The denouement is more intense and other worldly. It too is culled from another Murakami book, but at the moment I can’t remember which one.

Meanwhile, the relationship between Kafuku and Misaki evolves throughout the film. Like the story, Misaki is roughly the same age as the daughter Kafuku and Oto had had together but who had died very young and been the cause of their estrangement to one another for many years. Kafuku sees Misaki as a daughter figure. Misaki’s backstory is filled out to give her a character arc that intersects with Kafuku, both of them believing themselves to be responsible for the deaths of loved ones. The film’s final act sees them take a road trip to the remains of the house in which Misaki grew up.

Much of the core of the story is scooped out and refilled for the film, but this is fine. In writing a short story, a writer has to limit themselves as to the scope of what is included. The more complicated the narrative threads, the harder they are to all pull together into a tight weave. Although Murakami’s stories are often ambiguous, there still has to be enough from which the reader can draw their own meaning and conclusions. Drive My Car as a story is self-contained and narrow in scope. This is in contrast to Scheherazade and Kino, which are each opened ended and unresolved.

In extending the story to three hours, the details and stakes of the narrative necessarily have to be changed in order to fill a three hour run time. Therefore much of the detail and minutiae of the plot is altered. Yet that which is introduced is mostly all in keeping with the themes one finds running through Murakami’s fiction.

The only obvious omission is the supernatural elements that are a feature of much of what Murakami writes. There are other worldly threads within the film, but these are restricted to the stories Oto tells her lovers. The action we see is entirely routed in the real world. It is therefore more like Norwegian Wood, which is the only Murakami novel to date which is entirely based in reality.

Kafuku is a markedly different character in the film as compared to the story; more morose and isolated. Yet in many ways he is a more typical Murakami archetype than the Kafuku found in Murakami’s own story. Misaki is also given more pathos than the pencil-drawn outline of the story. Her fleshed out film persona is a combination of the tragic and the self-possessed women found in Murakami’s novels.

The film is, at times, glacially slow. This will inevitably put some people off watching it, coupled with its three hour run time and being, for the most part, subtitled. Personally, I found it a peasant change to watch something shawn of all noticeable special effects. As a sci-fi fan, special effects are fine as long as they are used to advance a narrative rather than replace it. Sadly, too many blockbuster movies these days seem to resemble a video game on demo mode.

Drive My Car is a film for Murakami fans, but it is also a film for readers in general. A film for people who enjoy a story well told. A story revealed through character and the things that are understood but left unspoken. As story where the viewer is left to draw their own conclusions.

Indeed the final scene of the film, like any good Murakami story, is ambiguous (although a little digging helps glean a few details that might be missed by a western audience). The main threads have been pulled together and tied off. Chekhov’s gun has been fired. Yet like Scheherazade’s truncated tales, there is always a little narrative left over for another day.

Read More

Reading Murakami (or What I Think About When I Read Haruki Murakami) 

Books on Film: A Scanner Darkly


 

Friday, 26 November 2021

Books on Film: A Scanner Darkly

Book: A Scanner Darkly, Philip K Dick, 1977 

Film: A Scanner Darkly, Dir. Richard Linklater, 2006

Richard Linklater‘s 2006 rotoscoped film, A Scanner Darkly, remains the most faithful cinematic adaptation of a Philip K Dick (PKD) novel to date. But then the competition for this accolade is hardly fierce. Few authors, it seems, have been so poorly served by Hollywood as PKD.

Both versions of A Scanner Darkly, novel and film, tell the tale of Bob Arctor (AKA Fred), an undercover police officer investigating a new street drug being sold in Los Angeles. The drug is known as Death, or Substance D. As Arctor insinuates himself into the drug culture of Orange County, he becomes increasingly addicted to Substance D, leading to his mental collapse and entry into rehab. 

A Scanner Darkly is partly based on PKD’s own experience and addictions. In the novel’s Afterward, PKD states that everything in the book is based on real events, before going on to give a roll call of his friends who died or were otherwise debilitated thorough addiction. PKD includes himself amongst the names of the fallen as having suffered permanent pancreatic damage. The stroke that ended his life in 1982 may have been a direct result of these earlier excesses.

While nominally considered a science fiction novel, there is little in A Scanner Darkly that could be considered futuristic. Other than holo technology and the Scramble Suits beneath which Arctor and his fellow officers conceal themselves at work, it is a novel routed in the here and now: Even if it is set in 1994 (or 2013 in the case of the film). 

Indeed, the relative ordinariness of the landscape is necessary to bring objects in the foreground into sharp relief. All of what is strange or other worldly in A Scanner Darkly is brought on by the debilitating effects of Substance-D. Hallucinations. Paranoia. Characters falling down rabbit holes of wild conspiracy theories. Arctor’s own eventual aphasia, as he becomes obvious to the fact that Bob Arctor and Fred are one and the same person.

Richard Linklater’s aim in rendering the live action with rotoscoping was to make the film feel more like a graphic novel at a time when the term, graphic novel, was starting to seep into the public consciousness. Yet the choice of rotoscope is appropriate to the story. The camera is itself an addict and views each scene through a disjointed narcotic haze of Substance-D. Moreover, PKD’s book does contain comic-book elements, like Charles Frick playing out paranoid scenarios in a thought bubble above his head. In a purely live action movie, this might come across as naïve or naff. In a comic or graphic novel, it is part of the narrative language. 

The film is far from a perfect or complete adaptation of the novel. Few films are. Novels are for the most part a continuous narrative. Cinema, being a direct evolution from theatre, is a series of set pieces threaded together. Thus scenes are truncated. Scenes are cut. Scenes appear out of order from the book. Jerry Fabin is excised from the film entirely and his few scenes given to Frick. Yet what remains is a fair representation of the original text.

Compare A Scanner Darkly to, say, Blade Runner. Blade Runner might be the best film adapted from a PKD novel and one of the best science fiction films ever made (in its 2007, Final Cut version), but its differences to Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep are legion. Even the name is taken from Alan E Nourse’s 1974 novel, The Bladerunner, adapted into a screenplay by William S Burroughs for a never made film.

Many, if not most, of the book’s main narrative threads are cut from Blade Runner. The replicants[1] are made more menacing. Much of the comedy is lost. Richard Deckard, a character of low status and low ambition in the novel, becomes heroically high status when played by Harrison ‘Indiana Jones’ Ford. A great movie, but not a great PKD adaptation.

Worse is Stephen Spielberg’s 2002 film, Minority Report, based on the 1956 PKD short story of the same name. The word, ‘based’ here is doing a lot of lifting. The PKD version is a nuanced evocation of Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle, where the act of observing an event changes that event. John Anderton is predicted to murder someone in the near future, causing him to police his own actions and ultimately defy the prediction. 

In the film this nuance is reduced to a clichéd, ten-a-penny Hollywood thriller that could’ve  (and has) been made at any time since the invention of sound. The effects are well executed but the futuristic landscape and technology are ultimately incidental to the plot. In all regards it is a poor shadow of the original source material. All cinematic adaptations of the written word are imperfect. Some are more imperfect than others.

Unlike Blade Runner, Minority Report, or indeed Total Recall, which again diverges wildly[2] from PKD’s short story, We Can Remember It For You Wholesale, A Scanner Darkly does a reasonable job of capturing the book’s narrative and themes. The main motif is one of paranoia. Everyone is paranoid, not just the addicts but the police as well. The later are so paranoid, they hide from each other behind Scramble Suits that generate a constant blur of fragmented images to render them barely visible to anyone looking in their direction. The effect is well approximated in rotoscope. 

At one level the Scramble Suit is the greatest flaw in A Scanner Darkly. If no-one knows who is and who isn’t a cop, how do they know who to monitor and who to ignore? Which is inevitably what happens. Fred, aka Bob Arctor, is charged with conducting surveillance on himself. Hs addiction has become such that when he is unmasked Arctor, it is most a surprise to himself. Even his immediate superior, Frank, has figured out who he is by that point. Which again seems to render the Scramble Suit a pointless plot device.

On the other hand, the Scramble Suit is PKD applying the twisted logic of the junkie to those supposedly in the know. The brass are so paranoid about their officers colluding with each other or with the dealers that neither they or anyone else knows who they are. Given the levels of assumed or actual conspiracy in the story, A Scanner Darkly resolves into a truth that is anathema to most conspiracy theories: Those in authority are no more well organised or less shambolic than the general population. 

Yet there is conspiracy here. The main dealer among the core group of addicts is also an undercover agent. The people growing Substance-D’s active ingredient also run the rehab clinics. In many ways, PKD predicted the recent opioid crisis in the US. The drug addled Arctor is sent to work on one of the farms on which the plants grow in the hope that his few remaining brain cells will fire and return with the evidence. Ultimately, it seems, his undercover mission was not to spy on Barris, Donna, or even Arctor, but to become so frazzled he can be sent into places other agents cannot infiltrate.

This is perhaps the weak point of the film. In the book, Arctor’s journey through rehab lasts several chapters. The cinematic version is rushed through in the final ten minutes. It’s understandable. At one hundred minutes, much fat needed to be trimmed to make it a lean production. Besides, the rotoscoping took eighteen months to complete as it was, whereas principle photography was completed in a few weeks. A longer film would have significantly increased the time to animate it. 

In other regards, the film squeezes in as much of the book as possible. It didn’t need to be much longer. It wouldn’t require, say, four seasons of a TV series to narrate a PKD book of similar length (I’m looking at you, The Man in the High Castle). A Scanner Darkly introduces little into the narrative that wasn’t already in the novel. It’s almost as if by employing rotoscope, Linklater felt little need to impose his own vision or ego upon the story in the way that most other directors invariably do.

There’s a nice touch where an preexisting stoned conversation about a man who pretended to have been a famous con artist (i.e. he faked being an fake) is augmented with reference to Catch Me if You Can, the 2002 Leonardo DiCaprio movie about a famous con artist. Although there is also a discontinuity when Hank, states that Fred could be anyone, including Barris, even though Hank has already seen Fred in the same room as Barris. In the book this makes sense, as it happens before Barris appears at the station. In the film those two scenes appear in a different order and apparently no one thought to amend the script. 

In spite of that, it’s difficult to imagine another cinematic PKD adaptation getting any closer to its source material than A Scanner Darkly. Nor should they try. Different mediums have different narrative methods and much fidelity is lost in the transfer process. Despite publishing forty four novels, there aren’t many remaining PKD books that would translate well onto film. Ubik maybe, which Linklater was originally going to make before dropping it in favour of A Scanner Darkly. Flow My Tears the Policeman Said would be interesting. VALIS, probably PKD’s best novel, would be next to impossible to film, not for anything in it, but in delaying the final reveal. A bit like trying to film Agatha Christie’s The Murder of Roger Ackroyd. The Penultimate Truth would be interesting if reframed to deal with the climate crisis.

In spite of its sprinkling of sci-fi elements, A Scanner Darkly is perhaps PKD’s most personal and autobiographical novel. It’s inappropriate to lump it in with purely sci-fi books like Ubik, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sleep, or Flow My Tears the Policeman Said, accomplished as these undoubtedly are. The science fiction elements in A Scanner Darkly are little more than a veneer applied to the farce and human tragedy beneath; like the rotoscoping drawn over the film. 

A Scanner Darkly fits better with PKD’s more grounded novels, like VALIS or The Transmigration of Timothy Archer. Indeed, those books were written in response to psychological episodes PKD experienced that were arguably the consequences of his earlier narcotic experiences. A Scanner Darkly does not quite scale the heights of VALIS, but would still make the list of many people’s best PKD books. And while A Scanner Darkly, the film, might not quite reach the heights of Blade Runner, it is still a faithful and honest attempt to portray and project the world as PKD saw it. 

All cinematic adaptations are unfaithful. Some are more faithful than others.



[1] A term absent from the novel

[2] Essentially the film’s first twenty minutes is loosely based on the story, after which it goes off entirely on its own trajectory.