"The other goat, the scapegoat chosen by lot to be sent away, will be kept alive, standing before the Lord. When it is sent away to Azazel in the wilderness, the people will be purified and made right with the Lord."
Leviticus
16:10
It seems to me that many of the obstacles we human beings
face vis-a-vis work, family, relationships, politics, religion etc., are really
the result of our failure to accept responsibility for our own actions. After
all, why admit and own your mistakes, experiencing personal growth as a result,
when it is much easier to blame your failures on the actions of others? Yet if
we never take responsibility for our actions, then there is little,
realistically, that we can ever do to affect their consequences for the future.
Like the man said, those who fail to learn from the mistakes of the past are
doomed forever to repeat them.
Ironically, this is not entirely our fault, but learned
behaviour that we been taught since year dot: Woman brought sin into the world,
the Jews killed Jesus, immigrants are stealing your jobs. Society's scapegoats
are all around us. Then, society shirks its responsibilities like no-one else.
Scapegoats provide an endpoint under which all unpleasant truths can be buried.
Drug users causes crime, but few dare ask what causes drug use, because then
the answer generally comes back as poverty. Drugs are the individual's problem,
but poverty is societal, so society takes drug use as its terminus, rather than
be in anyway implicated in the inequalities that its poverty perpetuates.
We each trace our problems back until we find a comforting version
of reality and then rest on our laurels. By which I mean that we stagnate. When
we nominate something as the avatar of all our personal misfortune, we give
that avatar immense power over us. For instance, if you consider certain words
or images to be blasphemous or profane, then all that anyone else has to do to
exert influence over is you is to use those words or images in your presence.
No wonder so many people around the world burn the American flag, when it is
the only form of retaliation that they have against the ubiquity of US invasion
and airstrikes. Why bother with a Predator drone, when you can wound millions
of patriotic Americans with little more high-tech equipment than a 50 cent
lighter?
The problem with blaming anything on any class of people
(women, men, Jews, Muslims, the poor, the young etc.) is that there will always
be more of them than there are of you. It's a simple physics problem: a large
mass exerts a greater force upon a smaller object than the smaller object does
on the larger, proportional to the difference in their two masses. If you're
one person seeing a particular demographic of a million or more as preventing
you from finding work, then you're never going to find work. Not because of
those million others, but from that single malfunctioning thought in your head
that has you beat before you even try.
Even worse is what our prejudices tell others about our
inner-lives. Most blame and scapegoating is the externalisation of personal
faults. If you want to know about a person's personal fears and anxieties, take
a look at what they blame on others. Politicians demonise those on benefits,
while crying poor and claiming expenses (politicians should be means tested the
same as everyone else). Homophobic men are scared that gay men will objectify
them in the same way that they objectify women. The guy that tells you certain
ethnicities smell is usually the one who could himself do with forming a closer
relationship to soap and water.
Moreover, the scapgoater will always be more afraid of the
scapegoat than the scapegoat is of their persecutor. Hence, American cops are
more afraid of unarmed black men than the other way around, presumably because
African-Americans have been subjected to the worst indignities that white
America has to offer for 240 years in a row, and they have endured. Like the
homophobic man, the racist is ultimately afraid that they will be in treated in
the same way that they have treated their victims. For the same reason, heavily
armed Israeli settlers, with the full financial and military backing of the government
of the United States of America behind them, lose their minds at the sight of a
few Palestinian kids throwing rocks. The downside to loading all of your fears
onto the shoulders of others is that you tend to become mortally afraid of them
out of all proportion to their actual dangerousness. "When you stare into
the abyss," as Nietzsche reminds us, "the abyss also stares into
you."
Inversely, lack of personal responsibility also leads people
to take credit for things in which they had little or no involvement. Look at
the British attitude to the Second World War. To listen to people in this
country, you'd think Britain defeated Nazi Germany all on its own. Yet 80% of
Hitler's forces were defeated by the Red Army, at the cost of twenty million
Russian lives. More Soviet troops died at Stalingrad than Britain and America
lost during the entire war combined, and it was still only the second biggest
loss of life that the Russians suffered (750,000 at Stalingrad, 850,000 at
Leningrad). Most of us alive today would not be here without them.
Indeed, if western society was half as civilised as it likes
to think it is, you'd think we'd spend as much time commemorating the lives of
people that we have killed as we do our own sacrifices. We hold silent vigils
to remember the Somme, D-Day, 9/11, but when do we ever fall silent for the
victims of Fallujah, Dresden, or the Irish and Indian famines of the nineteenth
century that left millions dead thanks to British governmental indifference?
The need to shirk our responsibility leads us to dismiss these fallen as enemies
that deserve no respect or remembrance, even when they have become our enemy
through no fault of their own. We celebrate Olympic victories, Shakespeare's
birth, and great British inventions like the world wide web, but when do we ever
bear responsibility for Britain's part in the eradication of the hundred
million people that lived in the Americas, before Europeans arrived with their
guns and their disease? This is not an attitude worthy of a civilised society.
A shirker treats other people as they have treated others. The responsible
person treats others as they would like to be treated themselves. This is why I
could never believe in the death penalty. Isn't one murderer enough? Why should
the rest of us become implicated in the crime?
For Britain, Hitler is the ultimate endpoint to negate all
else. Hitler killed eight million people, but he's dead now, so you don't need
to worry about people like him anymore. That way you can forget that it took
thousands of ordinary people to perpetrate the horrors of the Holocaust (and
definitely forget about any assistance the Nazis may have received from the IBM
corporation). It allows us to sweep all other colonial atrocities under the
tiger skin rug, as well as deferring, indefinitely, any discussion about how
Stalin virtually defeated Hitler single-handedly, having already killed twenty
million of his own people, and what this tells us about the convenient view of the
Second World War as a battle of good versus evil. Hitler is also a convenient
endpoint because he is just about the only one of the various genocidal maniacs
to besmirch the 20th century that Britain didn't support at any point.
I am bound to say at this point, because there are many
sensitive and fragile souls that shatter into a thousand pieces whenever anyone
expresses an opinion in any way divergent from their own (see Polyphemus
and the Myths of Monomania), that of course I am not belittling anything
that happened back then. Both my grandfathers fought with distinction in the
war. What I am saying is that they had pretty much wrapped it all up 28 years
before I was even born. I therefore find it hard to claim any credit for the
result, any more than I can claim to be a Petty Officer, just because my dad served
in the navy. These are events that occurred independent of my existence. A
football crowd may conceivably alter the course of a football match. Claiming
credit for something that you didn't bear witness to, and over which you
exerted no influence, is tantamount to theft. Or hypocrisy. Either way, the
result is unpleasant.
Which only leaves the individual, struggling to make sense
of the world. One way is to make others bear the burden for one's mistakes,
which only leads to increased feelings of nausea and impotence. Another
approach is to recognise that most of what happens in the human sphere of
existence is an admixture of judgement and luck. There is little to be done
about bad luck. Ill-judgement, on the other hand, can be mitigated against, but
it requires the honest assessment of past liability in order to be successful. The
most futile lie is the one that we tell to ourselves. A fault can only be
corrected if it has been traced back to its proper source. If the source is
misidentified, the item will continue to malfunction.
No comments:
Post a Comment